owners of the world

In 1984, three slogans dominate society: war is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. The slogan today, "war on terror", also includes an inversion of meaning. The war is terrorism. The most potent weapon in this war is the pseudo-information, which differs relatively descriptions of Orwell (Reference to the work of George Orwell, The Road to Airstrip One), solely on fashion, throwing into oblivion unacceptable truths and common sense history . Dissent is within permissible limits "consensual", reinforcing the illusion that information and speech are "Free".
 The attacks of September 11, 2001 not "changed everything", but accelerated the continuity of events, providing an extraordinary pretext to destroy social democracy. Part of reducing democracy to electoral ritual: that is, competition between parties impossible to distinguish, by administering a single state ideology. Crucial for the growth of this "state enterprise" are the media conglomerates, holding unprecedented power, including press and TV, publishing textbooks, film production and databases. They provide a virtual world of "eternal present", as the appointed Time magazine: Politics via media, via media war, justice via media and even grief via media (Princess Diana).
The "global economy" is his most important venture of the media. Á surface, means instant financial transactions, mobile (cellular), McDonald's, Starbucks, holidays marked by the Internet. Under this brightness, however, is the globalization of poverty, a world where most humans never makes a phone call and live on less than two dollars a day, a world in which 6000 children die every day from diarrhea, due to the fact most of them do not have access to clean water. In this world, it is "not observed" by most residents of the global North and some countries of the South, a sophisticated system of prey forced more than ninety countries, since the 80s, the programs of "structural adjustment" (Brazil entered straight), expanding as never before, the gap between rich and poor. This system is termed, "Building Nations" and "good government", the quartet dominating the World Trade Organization (USA, Europe, Canada and Japan) and the triumvirate of Washington (World Bank, International Monetary Fund and Department U.S. Treasury), even that control aspects of the details of government policies in developing countries. To promote all this are the multinational media companies, both American and European, among others (globe, record, etc.)., Own or manage major source of informative worldwide. These transform a large part of the "information society" in an era of extraordinary means in which technology allows the incessant repetition of information politically "safe" that is acceptable to the "nation builders."
 All this was and has been, day after day reported in the media as a "demonstration of why we watch" a "triumph of ideas," Evil on the Good, accompanied by a chorus of editorialists and columnists of the usual frivolous , to demand the retraction of those who dare to challenge the propaganda. Actually, neither directly involved in the attack of September 11 was Afghan, mostly, were Saudis, trained in France, Germany and the U.S., and none has been conducted to justice, however, millions of innocent people, inhabitants of villages insignificant dusty, were subject to capital punishment, without trial, in the manner of Texas, and many more are maimed over the years by tens of thousands of unexploded cluster bombs. That Afghan peasants have the same right to life as New Yorkers, British, French is forbidden to mention - a sacrilege. In other words, some lives have more value than others, and only to kill a certain number of civilians is a crime. Terrorists of Bin Laden and Bush are the same al-Assad and Obama both support themselves in old lies. "Operation Cyclone," the CIA trained and armed 35,000 zealots who became the "Terrorists".

(FBI + CIA = Well Makes Creating Enemies, Friends)
The government of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher support jihad (funded by the Americans) with greater enthusiasm. " The cost for the "American taxpayer" was 4 billion dollars.
No crime was murdering upwards of half a million peasants with bombs dropped secretly and illegally in Cambodia, igniting the fuse of an Asian holocaust. No crime was Clinton, Bush, Blair and their conservative predecessors they have caused the death in Iraq of "more people than were killed by all weapons of mass destruction in history. Using sections of the American and British presses as "conduits", American intelligence and its European coalitions built what the CIA called in Indochina, a "master illusion". That was the real threat of "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.

In Washington, the "Board of Oil and Gas" is increasingly influenced by commission Defense Policy, the group meets the far right of American politics, being responsible for the inspiration behind the "war on terrorism", especially the concept of "total war."
"... This whole conversation about going first treat of Afghanistan, then Iraq, then look around and see where things stand. This is the wrong way of doing things ... if we let our vision of the world go forth, if we apply ourselves fully to it, and if we fail to worry about practicing diplomacy elegant but simply desencadearmos a total war ... in a few years our children will sing hymns in our worship. "- Richard Perle, expert planning of the Reagan administration during the Cold War.
The "war on terrorism" or "bombing of an abstract noun." - Former member of Monty Python, Terry Jones. (There is an understandable logic in American enterprise of world conquest, it is part of this logic, constitute the long sought replacement of the "red menace." Justifying a situation of permanent war footing and paranoia and construction of the largest war machine of all times: the National Defensive Missile. This program, says the U.S. Space Command, will ensure "complete domination" of the world).
Sit in it an echo of the "thousand-year Reich."
History makes us better elucidate this process that extends back on lies and bloodshed of innocent victims. Concerning the newest dictator al-Assad and his opponents (mercenaries hired as always, for the "Builders of Nations").
With the outbreak of World War I, the Emir Faisal was proclaimed King of Greater Syria, as an offshoot of the Arab Revolt, the time, the intentions of France and the British Empire were unknown, but through the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Paris and London had divided the fertile crescent leaving Syria and Lebanon under control / French influence, while the British Empire exert control / influence over Palestine, Jordan and Iraq.
In 1920, France occupied the country militarily, forcing the evacuation of Faisal. Two months later, Syria was divided into five colonial states: Greater Lebanon (which added to the territory of other regions Small Lebanon), Damascus, Aleppo, Djabal Druze and Alawis (Latakia), of which the last four were reunited in 1924.
Until 1932, the country experienced relative calm in that year were elected president and parliament, but France made clear his intention not to allow a large internal autonomy. The negative French engendered unrest and conflicts, which ended in 1936 with an agreement where the French recognized the justice of the claims of the Syrians, and the main one was the reunification with Lebanon, however, this agreement was never ratified, which caused more agitation which culminated in 1939 with the resignation of Syrian president and the suspension of the Constitution of 1930.
In 1941, the Free French forces in a joint operation with the British Empire occupied the region ousting from power the collaborators.
In 1943 Al-Chikri were elected as president Quwatti in Syria, and Bechara Al-Kuri as president of Lebanon. However, when Bechara defended the deletion of clauses of the Constitution relating to French rule, this attitude led French troops to arrest him, along with his entire cabinet, which initiated new conflicts in Syria and Lebanon, which ended in March 1946, when the UN ordered the withdrawal of European forces and determined the end of French rule in the region (Source, WEB).
On December 2, 1991, Hafez al-Assad was reelected for the fourth time, with 99.98% of the votes in a referendum, fifteen days after the Syrian government freed 2,800 Muslim Brotherhood members who were arrested for reasons politicians.
Syria did not participate in the Oslo accords that allowed the establishment of a Palestinian Authority and the signing of peace agreements between Israel and Jordan in July 1994, it advocated a comprehensive solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict and demanded the complete withdrawal of Israel from Occupied Territories since the Six Day War in 1967.
In June 1995, began formal negotiations for the return of the Golan Heights to Syria which were unsuccessful because Israel has not relinquished maintain indefinitely a limited military presence in the region. In October, a confrontation between Hezbollah and Israeli troops in southern Lebanon complicated the resumption of negotiations.
In November 1997, in a context in which increased the chances of a new U.S. military intervention against Iraq, there was a rapprochement with Iraq, this rapprochement was part of a strategy against the Turkish-Israeli alliance, which at the time was rapid consolidation. In April 1998, Iran joined the Syrian-Iraqi negotiations on security issues.
We need to become aware of the double standards lethal force, according to which "international law" and "international community" are often no more than coutadas of Great Power, not expressing the will of the majority. The United States may form an expeditionary force with Britain, France, Italy and one or more cronies bribed and call it a "coalition" with the goal of pirate attacks in other countries, while more than 400 resolutions UN demanding Justice in Palestine are not worth the paper they own are printed. (The Libyan government called a special meeting of the UN Security Council, accusing the attacks from France and the United States of infringing determinations signed by the agency to determine military intervention in the country, the Bureau Popular Libyan Arab in a statement - With this aggression over the effect Resolution No. 1973 in relation to the imposition of a no-fly zone and become the right of the Arab Republic of Libya the use of military and civil aircraft in self-defense after the French breached the space-fly - France began airstrikes: Aircraft French were responsible for firing the first shots in what is the biggest international military intervention in the Arab world since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, destroying tanks and armored vehicles in Benghazi, a region dominated by rebels. Forces and U.S. aircraft will participate the operation of five countries named Odyssey Dawn (Aurora's Odyssey, in rough translation), alongside the United Kingdom, France, Canada and Italy. Around 25 coalition ships, including three U.S. submarines armed with Tomahawk missiles, are positioned in Mediterranean showed a presentation military).

There's the "Arab Prima_Vera again or" bombardment of an abstract noun. "
Sarkozy's campaign was funded by Gaddafi, says site: "document former head of intelligence services outside of Libya, Mussa Kussa, describes an" agreement in principle "to" support the campaign of presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy, with an amount of 50 million euros. " The text also says the agreement is a result of a "meeting held on 06.10.2006, which was attended, on our side, the head of Libyan intelligence services [Abdallah Senussi] and President of the Libyan African Investment Fund [Bachir Saleh], and the French side, and Brice Hortefeux Ziad Takieddine. "

Hortefeux is a longtime friend of Sarkozy, his government turned to the interior minister of France. Have the lawyer of businessman Franco-Lebanese Ziad Takieddine story told the site that the man "was not present at the meeting indicated in the document," but that "he thinks the document is reliable, since the date mentioned and people."
We also need to review the current use of the word "We" and its appropriation by the Great Power. If "We" we fight terrorism, then "we" terms that require the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Australia and their allies comparças (Israel, Saudi Arabia, etc..) To halt Terror engaged in the Middle East, Colombia and elsewhere. Only then "we" can make the world a safer place.